British Boats of the Roman Era and their possible survivals:a preliminary sketch
|
|||
|
|
Edwin Deady 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|||
|
The Romans came by sea and they moved goods around Britain
by water. This paper will examine the types of inshore and inland craft available
to the Romans and their methods of construction as well as including some
reference to open sea examples. Frank Lloyd Wright truly said that form follows function.
Boats are a very special case of this truism, available materials and skills
are the elements that determine what particular form will evolve to fulfil a
specific function and will affect the how well that function is performed. At the start of the Roman era in Britain there were
examples of native skin craft and dugouts, I have sketched impressions each. The upper, skin Currach,
is after the sort built as an experiment by Peter Faulkner using only hazel,
willow and rough cured cow’s hide, the lower dugout is drawn from the Finnish
Rus-Project experiment. Flat or scow-ended examples are known from UK Bronze
and Iron Age periods, as are more elaborate sewn-plank boats such as the
Ferriby series. |
|
|
|
Basketwork skin-covered currach Dugout log canoe |
SKIN One of the earliest mentions of coracles is in The
History of Herodotus, written about 424 BC. The Greek historian describes
boats round like a shield travelling down the river to Babylon. Descended
from vessels described by Roman writers, coracles have been used in Great
Britain (Wales, Scotland and Ireland) for centuries. In an account Julius
Caesar writes of ocean-going currachs with sails that roved the North
Atlantic. In the sixth century St. Brendan may have journeyed to America in a
Currach and the Dalriadans fought fleet actions with Currachs. |
Pharsalia
|
|
|
|
The skin boat will almost never have left any direct
evidence of its existence in the archaeological record. We do have
circumastantial physical evidence to support their existence as well as
literary references and there is a wealth of post-Roman literary evidence for
the use of both large and small boats made of wickerwork and covered with
hide. We do, have archaeological evidence that the inhabitants of Britain did
have the means to make the sort of boats they are recorded as using. |
|
The essentials of a skin boat are the frame and the
covering. Barry Cunliffe and others have pointed out that the settlements of
the Iron Age inhabitants in the pre-Roman era resembled nothing so much as a
collection of greater and lesser baskets. Evidence of wickerwork to support
this has been found at Flag Fen, for example. Leather working is known from
bog deposits where actual example of leather has been found. It is also
possible that lighter craft with textile coverings might have been used as
the weaving skills were certainly present and so were the means to make a
waterproofing tree sap based tar. The 19th Century Welsh coracle
of flannel and tar was supposed to be half the weight of a hide covered
version (Geraint Jenkins, Nets and Coracles). |
|
TheCurrach, also known as Curragh, Navog and Dingle Canoe,
is of a “proper” boat shape with a length to width ratio of about 5:1 while
the coracle is almost round or, at best, oblong. The performance of these craft has also been tested in
real life fishing and farming operations in Ireland (Mac Cullagh, The Irish
Currach Folk) and in reproductions (Moffat, The Sea Kingdoms). The essence of
both coracle and Currach is that they are sea-kindly and responsive. Trying
out a hide-covered coracle built with the help of Peter Faulkner I found this
to be true. Easily upset, they may be turned more easily than a canoe
although one would want the aid of a river current to travel any distance. |
|
While a suitably trussed cow may be carried in a Currach
to an offshore island and four people are known to have been ferried across
the River Severn at one time standing up in a coracle to carry serious
amounts of freight the Romans would have needed to find or introduce sturdier
more burdensome craft. The possible native and introduced vessels of log and
plank construction will be outlined in the next section. |
|
The gold model of a possible skin boat “Currach” is part
of a hoard unearthed by a farmer's plough in 1896 in town land at Broighter
on Lough Foyle near Derry. |
.
|
Pictish inscriptions include the Weymiss cave image. Picture of the inscription has been coloured to enhance features. . |
|
|
|
The impression that Njall of the Nine Hostages’ Currach
may have given on a raiding expedition in the crucial years of the early 5th
Century. (Picture from “Seals and the Currach” by RM Lockley Dent
1954) |
|
A modern version of the ancient skin covered Currach in
action |
|
Peter Faulkner (standing in pink shirt) commanding the
cowhide Currach built by himself. |
|
|
|
Coracles at Newbury Show 2002. Built by Peter Faulkner. (My photograph) |
|
WOODEN HULLS Wood is a versatile and strong material and may be used to build a heavy vessel capable of weathering violent storms far out at sea and to build light boats capable of using the smallest streams with a minimal draught.
|
|
The sea-going boats There were Channel-sailing Celtic ships. Julius Caesar
recorded direct experiences of heavy-planked boats when conducting naval
operations against the Veneti. |
|
We do have an example of a Roman period ship built in the “Celtic” manner described above and used for cargo carrying, the Blackfriars boat. “This Roman ship was discovered by Peter Marsden in 1962 in
the bed of the River Thames, off Blackfriars in the City of London, and
excavated in 1962-1963. The ship was a wreck that lay about 120 metres from
the Roman shore at the southwest corner of the Roman city of Londinium. The construction of the ship was dated to about AD 150 by
dendrochronology,…The wreck was about 14m long and 6.5m wide, and comprised
the bottom and parts of the collapsed sides of a Romano-Celtic ship. The
vessel was built of oak (Quercus) and had no keel, but instead two broad
keel-planks. A stempost lay at the bow and a sternpost at the stern. The
planks were carvel laid and fastened by large iron nails to oak frames -
massive floor-timbers in the bottom, and lighter side-frames at the sides The mast-step was a rectangular socket in a transverse
floor-timber about one-third of the length of the vessel from the bow, and in
the bottom of the step was a votive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The inland boats As well as the heavy timbered “Celtic” style boat there is
a long history in Britain of the logboat and of planked boats developed form
the original type. Then simple log
that is hollowed out to make a canoe can make an efficient and useful craft
but its dimensions, particularly its breadth, are limited by the size of the
original tree-trunk. There are several ways of overcoming this. The outrigger
option common in Oceania and the Far East seems not to have been adopted in
the West. The choices of development in the West appear to be between
building up and expanding the sides of the logboat or of splitting the
hollowed out log and inserting a middle plank making a flat-bottomed boat
with very strong “girders” formed
from the split halves of the log. The sequence of examples for the expanded logboat form may
be seen in the Hjortspring, Nydam and “Viking” boats from Scandinavia. For
Britain we have the Ferriby series and the Dover Bronze Age Boat. Survivals
of the native type can be seen in such boats as the Severn Salmon Punt with
its three strong bottom planks joined by through iron bolts. It is also
interesting to note the fact ( Albany Major, The Early Wars of Wessex) that
there is a range of boats peculiar to Southern England that seem to offer a
combination of Celtic and Northern European thinking. The Parret Turf Boat
and the Combwich Flatner from Somerset are similar to the boats along the
South Coast that have flat or slightly dished bottoms made up of three
cross-joined planks and are double-ended with overlapping (clinker) side
planks. |
|
|
|
|
|
c 2030 BC (formerly dated to ca 1500-1700 BC). According to the older analysis the youngest boats are dated to c 800-1100 BC. Reconstruction drawing of Ferriby I by Axel Nelson. Construction detail of Ferriby I, by Axel Nelson. Ref: British Museum Encyclopaedia of Underwater and Maritime Archaeology
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Illustration (Majors, Early Wars of Wessex) showing the
possible combined features of the Celtic and Northern European boat building
styles. Note the flat-bottom and the three overlapping strakes for the sides. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
One function and possible form for the “grain tax boats” To use the small canals and canalised rivers and small
berths provisionally identified at Chiseldon, Wiltshire and Littlecote a
particular kind of boats would be needed. It should probably be not more than
4-5 feet wide or 15 feet long in order to negotiate the small streams leading
to the Kennet. The draught couldn’t exceed more than about six inches. Such a boat could carry a useful payload discovered by the
formula: Floating Volume in cubic feet multiplied by the weight of
a cubic foot of water, 62.5 lbs. Thus 15x5x.5x62.5=2343 lbs which is
nearly a ton. Craft carrying half or three-quarters of a ton would still be a
better proposition than trying to carry the equivalent load on the roads.
There is no reason why a string of “butties” could not have been used with
one crew for them all. There is one example from Ireland that may be of Roman
origin and matches our specifications and could have been introduced as the
“type” boat for small-scale grain transport. This is the Lough Lene Boat,
burdensome but light and of Mediterranean Carvel construction. Although an
unlikely place to find a Roman boat, there was trade between Ireland and the
Empire (Raftery, Pagan Celtic Ireland).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raftery, Pagan Celtic Ireland.
The flush or carvel oak planks can be seen with an indication of the mortice and peg plank fastenings at the ends. |
|
|
|
|
|
Another possibility for grain carrying, a version of the Severn Salmon Long Net Punt, note the three plank cross-joined flat bottom. http://www.salmonboats.co.uk/index2.html |
|
Only the 15 foot mid-section has been recovered but was
this the type of boat that fed the taxes from villa to collecting fort, that
journeyed across the Wiltshire Downs from Chiseldon to Cunetio? We have no
idea of the boatmen but in the fourth-century they might have been composed
of tough, time-expired veteran auxiliaries from the Rhine poling downstream
with spears they would be ready to use. |
|
|
|
|
|
Head of reproduction Angon, were these used to defend the
vital grain shipments? They have been found in early Anglo-Saxon graves (Swanton,
Spearheads of the Anglo-Saxon Settlements) |
|
Jouneys and safe havens ? |
|
|
|
|
|
The strand below Tintagel, a possible beach landing area
for late Roman era and Dark Age trade. (My photograph |
|
|
|
River Og, a possible grain route from Chiseldon to the
River Kennet and Cunetio. Taken from the bridge near Wetpit in Ogbourne St. Andrew. http://www.ogbourne.org.uk/html/the_river_og.html
from the Og website |
|
|
Where the grain tax boats may have docked at Littlecote, Berkshire, on the River Kennet. (Ellis, Roman Wiltshire and After) |
|
|
Bibliography Peter Ellis ed Roman Wiltshire and After WANHS 2001 J. Geraint Jenkins Nets and Coracles David and Charles 1974Paul Johnstone The Sea-Craft of Prehistory Routledge 1980Richard Mac Cullagh The Irish Currach Folk Wolfhound Press 1992Eric McKee Working Boats of Britain Conway 1983Shaum McGrail et al The Earliest Ships Conway History of the Ship Brassey 1996Albany Major Early Wars of Wessex Blandford Press 1978Alistair Moffat The Sea Kingdoms Harper Collins 2001Barry Raftery Pagan Celtic Ireland Thames and Hudson 1994M J Swanton TheSpearheads of the Anglo-Saxon Settlements RAI 1973Richard Underwood Anglo-Saxon Weapons And Warfare Tempus 1999AndJoan du Plat Taylor & Roman Shipping and Trade: Henry Cleere (editors) Britain and the Rhine Province CBA 1978 (available online http://ads.ahds.ac.uk/catalogue/) |